How we manage combat in Sorcerer. Might work for you, too.
Take one suit from a deck of cards – so, you have 13 cards.
Once everybody rolls to determine priority of action, hand out the cards: Ace (“one”) to the highest roll, 2 to the next highest, etc. Everybody leaves their card showing face-up on the table. Now resolve actions in order, starting with the character who has the Ace card and proceeding numerically. Turn your card face-down when:
- you take your action
- you abort your action, e.g. to roll full defense
- your action is obviated due to changing circumstances
When you’ve got a dozen PCs, NPCs and demons acting at once, this can really help to remember who should act when, without having to re-survey all the rolls, and especially to remember who has aborted their action. It’s not too hard for a player to remember their PC’s place in the order, but the GM is potentially tracking 5-10 characters including everyone’s demons, so this really helps them.
I originally made cards for this: orange on one side, blue on the other, with the numbers written on both sides. But I think playing cards would work just as well. If you have more than 13 actors, start a second suit.
I find this quicker than the method described in Annotated Sorcerer, drawing circles and numbered arrows on a piece of paper. The drawback is that the cards method doesn’t record who is acting against whom. I suppose the methods could be combined.
– – –
You could do Stephen King’s Pet Cemetery as a Sorcerer tale. Burying a body is the ritual to summon a possessor or parasite demon to re-animate it. The pet cemetery’s cursed grounds provide a Lore bonus. The demon has the Cover ability to mimic whatever or whoever you buried there. But it also has a Need, and it gets nasty if you don’t provide it…
Posted in Sorcerer RPG | Tagged cards, combat, Game aids, Pet Cemetery, Sorcerer | Leave a Comment »
The tale of the D.C. Beltway Sniper – a man and a teenage boy terrorize D.C. with a sniper rifle over several weeks – is a Sorcerer tale. A teenage boy in Alabama was going through hell, and none of the adults in his life would give him the help he needed. In his desperation, he created a demon in the form of his childhood hero: a revered uncle who had just died in Afghanistan. A demon with a Desire to protect the boy, and a Need to kill. The demon hunted down and shot the boy’s tormentor, but it didn’t end there. As more bullies and less-favourite teachers turned up dead, the boy realized that he had endangered his whole town. He tried to unsummon the demon, but it proved too strong. That’s when it kidnapped him, stole a car, and took the killing spree on the road.
The boy struggled between his fear of discovery and his fear of the murderous fiend in the shape of his uncle. He nudged the roadtrip towards the nation’s capital, hoping to be captured there. Once, he mastered himself long enough to telephone for help. It was a few more days before the authorities caught up with the pair. They couldn’t have subdued the demon without the boy’s help.
What really happened between their arrest in 2002 and the demon’s “execution” in 2009, we’ll never know.
– – –
The setting-and-character generation session is still a week away, so this is how I exercise my creative energy (and exorcise my obsession).
I’ve just finished re-reading the Annotated Sorcerer, the re-issue of the Sorcerer rulebook complete with the author’s extensive observations and comments on 15+ years of play (his and ours) and discussion on The Forge forums. It’s a great resource. I still wish Ron Edwards had updated or rewritten the rulebook, because finding the definitive version of a rule requires perusing both the original text and the nearby notations. But the annotations taken together comprise a master class in running/playing Sorcerer, and in Forge-style play. Valuable, fascinating reading.
Since our game’s scenario will be based on the characters’ kickers, this (re-reading the rulebooks, and finding sorcerous tales in pop culture and current events) is the only “prep” that I can do.
Posted in Sorcerer RPG | Tagged Beltway Sniper, Ron Edwards, rpg, Sorcerer, Sorcerer RPG, The Forge | Leave a Comment »
This is my pitch for a new game of Sorcerer that I’m putting together. It will be unique in a couple of ways. First, the pitch, which was aimed at players who are totally unfamiliar with the Sorcerer RPG:
“Know this: all the traditions, cultures, rituals, and bodies of knowledge surrounding what we call magic or the occult are wrong. It is hogwash, flimflam, swindlery, and lies. But even so, here and now in the modern world, there are perhaps several dozen sorcerers in existence. They do summon demons and bind them to their will. They do have an inkling, although no surety, about the unnatural laws.
You are one of them.” –Ron Edwards, Sorcerer (rulebook)
Sorcerer is a game that explores “what do you WANT, and how far are you willing to go to get it?” As you can imagine, summoning and bargaining with demons can be… hazardous. There is no secret school of magic, no accepted body of sorcerous knowledge. Besides your fellow PCs, you maybe know one other sorcerer. You’re pretty much on your own in dealing with these crafty, extra-planar fuckers. You have no magic, no powers of your own, except the ability to summon, bind and banish demons. But demons can give you almost any power imaginable – for a price. Want to be invulnerable to weapons? Want to be able to fly? Want a slavering beast that’ll tear apart your enemies? No problem, as long as you can pay their price. Need more? Demons will give you all the power you want. They are the ultimate loan-sharks.
Why Sorcerer kicks ass:
- Combat is flexible, cinematic and fast. A fight usually resolves within 5-10 minutes, and with serious consequences.
- Players have lots of creative input. By the choices you make for your PC during character creation, YOU basically tell ME what you want to see and do in the game. And then I go and create a situation based on your characters.
- Your creative control continues throughout the game. The GM does not plan an adventure from beginning to end; he runs the world and provides opposition, but YOU take the story wherever you want to.
- A demon can be almost anything: a red, pointy-tailed devil, a kid’s imaginary friend, a parasite that lives in your gut, an intelligent magic item, a rogue AI, etc..
- The system is fairly simple, I can teach it as we go. No homework will be assigned. ;-)
What do you think? Want to see if you can use the ultimate users, and come out on top?
The pitch worked, the players are IN, and I can’t wait to get started. Why this game will be unique (for me):
- The players are traditional D&D players who are willing to try something new. They tend to play very dramatically and collaboratively, but are unused to rules sets that support that kind of play directly.
- I’ve run Sorcerer in Melniboné and in 1941 Casablanca, I’ve played Sorcerer in Mu, but I’ve never played or run it straight-up, by the book, in the here-and-now, as this game will be.
- I’ve always used the relationship-map method of scenario creation. This time, I’m just going to go with the advice in the core book. I think this will bring maximal focus on the PCs’ kickers.
I look forward to introducing these players to Forge-style play. They’re pretty pro-active players already, so I don’t think it’ll be much of a culture shock. And I look forward to going in with an open mind, hearing their character concepts, awesoming-up their kickers, and then taking a week to come up with a scenario based entirely on that.
Posted in Sorcerer RPG | Tagged kickers, pitch, Ron Edwards, rpg, Sorcerer | Leave a Comment »
Yesterday, we played The Clay That Woke for the first time (Paul Czege, Half Meme Press, 2014). I’ll do a separate post overviewing the game, later. For now, my impressions of play:
Overall: Fun. Emergent story in a weird exotic world, with moments of character awesomeness, interspersed with first-night rules confusion.
There were a lot of breaks to debate rules and meanings, maybe no more than any other first night with a new game, but they weren’t things we could really look up in the text. So we proceeded with uncertainty, and were carried along by our enthusiasm. I think the second session will go a lot smoother, and we’re all looking forward to seeing where things go for our minotaurs.
- We had an awkward start, with 3 minotaurs in 3 different places — I don’t do well with separate scenes for every player — but we eventually got going in a rhythm of round-robin scenes. I can see that we’re moving towards getting all the PC minotaurs together eventually.
- Some scenes that I had planned (movings) didn’t come to a clear inflection, and I realized that I had included them as exposition.
- We paused often to debate how the Silence applied in certain situations. When a minotaur speaks out against an injustice, is that following the Silence or breaking Silence? If he keeps quiet, isn’t that also breaking silence? So, as a GM, am I setting up no-win situations? Is debating this part of the intended play experience, or are we just misunderstanding something that’s meant to be clear?
- Unfortunately, the minotaurs’ initial lack for names means I’m calling the players by their own names during play, something I normally try not to do. I guess I could call them by their archetype instead: “leader, advocate,” etc.
- At first, priming the Krater represented a big break from the fiction, but we got good at it quickly, and by the end of the night, we could do it wordlessly. The few dozen seconds it took, and the players’ resource decisions, really built tension. Drawing the oracle inspired nervousness. After the draw, everyone dove for their menus of Krater outcomes to interpret it for themselves.
- As the GM, playing Intrinsics with weird ideas is FUN, really fun. So is playing Voices.
- The perwiiga tree jungle encounter went well. Tense moral argument. Ry drew from the krater (earned a Name token, I think), and decided to keep 3 of the seeds. He later used 1 to save a man crushed by a scourge, and used Regard to ensure that another seed would get planted deep in the jungle where a new perwiiga tree would grow to maturity unmolested.
- The situation at the gladiatorial games changed quickly. Mike lead a worker’s revolt, and now the Games will determine ownership of the arena and the workers! Unexpected, and awesome.
- The gladiator minotaur was grievously injured. Two players then decided that their minotaurs were twin brothers, and they have now secretly switched places so that the “gladiator” can remain in the games. The advocate must fight, and the soldier must treat the wounded. This should be interesting!
- I burned through about 3/4 of the movings that I had prepared – which is the perfect amount, I think. Some things resolved quickly, and some really dug in hard.
A few further thoughts from Ry:
I was fucking awesome. I killed two scourges and dealt with the Bright. Then I got cocky and I got tricked out of Silence really fast. My herd needs to be a big part of next chapter.
The game was asking a lot of you as the GM. There’s a certain possibility or going with the flow that the game rewards for a player character. So the GM has to do a lot of work even just getting the players to be in the same place at the same time. We were quite disconnected.
We wondered about want versus need and speaking up about injustice.
I got the sense that thinking like an intrinsic is really crazy crazy crazy hard.
I came away with the thought that the game needs more color visuals during play.
– – – – –
There’s still a lot more of this game to see. We are just getting to the point where PC minotaurs are going to run out of tokens for the first time. No one has gone frantic yet, we haven’t seen Truths or Gifts yet, and no PC minotaur has earned a name. Looking forward to exploring it further.
Posted in Actual Play | Tagged ClayTalk, minotaur, Paul Czege, TCTW, The Clay That Woke | Leave a Comment »
Grappling, tackling, wrestling, restraining.
“Dreaded,” because of the whole grappling mini-game in 3.5E D&D. Anyway, I’m about to run my 2nd Dungeon World session, and I just need to wrap my head around how to handle grappling in this game. The rules don’t address it specifically. I know the short answer is “with fictional positioning, dummy.” Well, this dummy just needs to chew it out a bit more, beforehand. Why? “Tentacles.” So, my thoughts based on a quick web search:
Grappling as a PC move:
Hack and slash to grapple an opponent, and maybe deal reduced damage too, depending on circumstances. How this may affect the creature:
- next move is used just breaking the grapple
- or, can only attack the grappling PC for reduced damage
- another PC can damage, rob or tie up the grappled creature, without rolling
Grappling as a GM move:
“You’re grappled.” How this may affect the PC:
- Before taking action, you might have to Defy Danger using Strength, first. On a miss, the creature that has you grappled can deal damage, drag you away, hold you while another ties you up, or… On a 7-9, you can get free, but it might cost you your pack /armour /weapon, or some hit points, or maybe you’ll only free your sword arm, or you knock a companion down while getting away, or…
- Ignoring the grapple (e.g. to cast a spell or something) might count as giving the GM a golden opportunity.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Dungeon World, fictional positioning, Grappling, moves, tentacles | Leave a Comment »
Some brilliant game designs have arrived that encourage invention at the table, which allows play with little or no prior preparation and gives players more creative input into the emergent story.
I realized today that I really miss certain elements of the old way of role-playing, of playing in worlds that were prepared by the GM or a publisher: exploration and discovery.
When you know that the whole world exists outside of your game, that it was created a priori before you decided to play in it, then you are exploring something greater than yourself and your group of friends. The feeling is akin to that of reading The Lord of The Rings for the first time; except not just experiencing it linearly, but stepping into it and turning over the rocks yourself.
Emergent play has its revelatory merits too; you explore your own creative ideas, you experience and are perhaps surprised by your friends’ contributions. Players certainly have more creative input into the action. This kind of play can be extremely rewarding, and I won’t say that one kind is better than the other.
But in extemporaneous play, I never get that sense of awe that comes with stomping around in a world that feels real and permanent and old and full of secrets.
And I miss that.
How could I design some mechanics to evoke that feeling of exploring a rich world, in a story-now game? This question just launched me into a serious brainstorming session. But I’m going to work on these thoughts a bit before sharing them. What ideas do you have?
Posted in Gaming Theory, Uncategorized | Tagged discovery, exploration, exploring, low-prep gaming, rpg, Story Now!, worlds, zero-prep gaming | Leave a Comment »