Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘set piece’

I’m preparing the setting for a campaign based on the excellent Elric Saga by Michael Moorcock, a set of books that I just can’t recommend highly enough.  And although the Elric novels were a big inspiration for the Sorcerer RPG, we’re not sure that Sorcerer is the right system for my Elric game…

This is a highly charged project.  I love the source literature, and my expectations for the game are sky-high.  The potential for a mismatch and disappointment at the table is definitely there.  So I’m taking a close look at my expectations before this goes much further.

Mike, Pete, Ry and I spoke about this at length, and my thanks to them for sharing their perspectives.  Any great ideas in here are theirs, any stupidity is mine.

I Want Sharks With Frickin’ Lasers On Their Heads

I have to admit that I have some pretty specific things that I want to happen in this game.  Here’s the big one.  A PC finds himself facing an overwhelming enemy; defeat is clearly in the cards.  He somehow buys himself a few minutes, casts his mind out into the multiverse and contacts just the right supernatural ally.  If his foe is a swarm of giant insects, he summons the Beast Lord of the Iguanas, which appears and eats them all.   If his foe is the Elohoin, a race of flesh-eating warrior women from an alien plane, he summons their sworn enemies the Grashnaks from across the void, who take up the fight with relish.

Basically, I want to see on-the-spot sorcery that turns the tide of battle.  And let’s leave aside the mechanical difficulties of this in the Sorcerer mechanics as written, cuz I have some ideas.  But for now, some quality-of-play concerns:

If I set up situations that only have one possible solution, then this won’t be Story Now.  It’ll be more like one of those old text adventures: if you have the key, and the old boot, and the crow bar and the gas mask, then you can get through the laboratory safely; otherwise, you’re screwed.  I’ll be hogging all the story-telling responsibilities and the players will just be following along.  A related concern: If I set up the situation, and the players find some other solution, how disappointed am I going to be?  So I have to:

  • create rich environments for set-piece conflicts, so the PCs have lots of things to interact with, lots of resources from which to build solutions.
    “PCs need sets the way Errol Flynn needs sets.”
  • accept that the outcome of the situation is not in my hands.  The players decide the characters’ actions, the dice decide their success or failure.

And remember: NO RAILROADING.  This goes for on-the-spot sorcery as well as summoning Lords of Chaos, visiting Ameeron or anything else from the books.  Okay no problem, I can do that.

Action-Packed

The Elric stories are fast-paced and action-packed, whereas Sorcerer is focused on developing story based around theme and  “Humanity.”  Maybe I should pick a more Step-On-Up system like Apocalypse World or even some sort of d20 hack.  But I don’t want to lose the Story Now… do I?

As far as I’m concerned, the best elements of Sorcerer are Kickers and Bangs, and these parts seem pretty portable.  Can a Step-On-Up system be played with elements of Story Now?  Sure it can.  But… if players know they’re going into a Step On Up game, an Us-vs.-Them cage match where the “Them” is the GM and all his creations, then they’re going to be trying to load their character backstories and kickers with all kinds of advantages for the fights ahead.  They won’t be thinking about creating cool Story.  That’s not the way I want this to go down.

Can Sorcerer do fast-paced and action-packed?  Sure it can.  The game’s conflict-resolution (as opposed to task-resolution) system ensures that combat situations evolve rapidly and in interesting ways.  Headlocks, chair-throwing, flying tackles and swinging from the chandeliers!  But… we’re gonna want to make some tweaks.

Next Up: The Tweaks

 

Read Full Post »